Home > Extradition from UAE — Complete Guide by Country (2026) > Extradition from UAE to Europe — Country-by-Country Guide > Extradition from UAE (Dubai) to Belgium — Treaty 2021, Process & Defence 2026

Extradition from UAE (Dubai) to Belgium — Treaty 2021, Process & Defence 2026

## The UAE–Belgium Extradition Treaty\n\nYes, the United Arab Emirates can extradite individuals to Belgium under a bilateral extradition treaty signed in 2021 and ratified in November 2022. The treaty establishes a formal legal framework for mutual surrender of fugitives wanted for serious criminal offences, governed domestically by Federal Law No. 39 of 2006 on International Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters. Whether in Dubai, Abu Dhabi, or other emirates, persons facing Belgian arrest warrants may now be surrendered through this streamlined bilateral mechanism, replacing the previous reliance on reciprocity arrangements.\n\nThe UAE–Belgium extradition relationship represents a significant development in judicial cooperation between the Gulf region and European Union member states. The bilateral treaty entered into force following ratification by both countries in late 2022, creating binding obligations that facilitate the transfer of fugitives while maintaining human rights safeguards. For anyone facing potential extradition from UAE to Belgium, understanding both the treaty provisions and UAE domestic law is essential to mounting an effective defence.\n\nThe bilateral extradition treaty between the UAE and Belgium was formally signed in 2021 as part of broader efforts to enhance judicial cooperation in combating transnational crime. After completing domestic ratification procedures in both countries, the treaty entered into force in November 2022. This agreement followed similar patterns established in other UAE extradition treaties with European nations, including extradition from UAE to Netherlands, extradition from UAE to France, and extradition from UAE to Germany.\n\n### Key Provisions of the Treaty\n\nThe UAE–Belgium treaty incorporates several fundamental principles that govern all extradition proceedings between the two countries. The dual criminality requirement stands as a cornerstone: the conduct underlying the Belgian extradition request must constitute a criminal offence under both Belgian and UAE law. This means that acts legal in the UAE but criminal in Belgium cannot form the basis for extradition, regardless of Belgian legal characterisations.\n\nThe specialty principle (also known as the rule of speciality) protects extradited persons from prosecution for offences other than those specified in the extradition request. Once Belgium receives a surrendered individual from Dubai or other UAE jurisdictions, Belgian authorities may only prosecute crimes explicitly mentioned in the original request and approved by UAE authorities. Any subsequent prosecution for different offences requires fresh extradition proceedings or UAE consent.\n\nPolitical offence exceptions feature prominently in the treaty framework. Neither country is obligated to surrender individuals wanted for purely political crimes, though this exception has narrowed considerably in modern treaty practice. Serious crimes such as terrorism, even when politically motivated, typically fall outside the political offence exception under contemporary interpretations.\n\nThe treaty mandates that extradition requests contain sufficient evidence to establish probable cause or reasonable suspicion that the requested person committed the alleged offences. Belgium must provide documentation including arrest warrants, charging instruments, statements of facts, applicable legal provisions, and evidence linking the fugitive to the crimes. The evidentiary threshold, while lower than trial standards, requires substantive proof beyond mere accusations.\n\n## How Extradition from UAE to Belgium Works\n\nUnderstanding the procedural pathway from initial request to actual surrender is critical for anyone facing potential extradition from Dubai or other UAE locations to Belgium. The process involves multiple stages, each governed by Federal Law No. 39 of 2006 on International Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters and implementing regulations.\n\n### Step One: Formal Request Submission\n\nBelgian authorities initiate extradition by transmitting a formal request through diplomatic channels to the UAE Ministry of Justice, which serves as the designated Central Authority for all extradition matters. The Belgian Federal Public Service Justice typically coordinates these requests, ensuring compliance with treaty requirements and UAE specifications. Requests must arrive in Arabic or accompanied by certified Arabic translations, as UAE proceedings occur in Arabic.\n\nProvisional arrest may precede the formal request when urgency exists. Belgium can request emergency detention of a fugitive located in Dubai or elsewhere in the UAE pending transmission of complete extradition documentation. Provisional arrest requests must contain sufficient information identifying the person, describing the offences, confirming the existence of an arrest warrant, and indicating that formal extradition documents will follow. UAE authorities may detain the subject for limited periods—typically 40 days—while awaiting the complete request.\n\n### Step Two: Ministry of Justice Review\n\nThe UAE Ministry of Justice as Central Authority conducts an initial administrative review upon receiving Belgium’s extradition request. Officials verify that the documentation meets formal treaty requirements: proper authentication, Arabic translations, legal basis citations, and evidentiary sufficiency. Incomplete requests are returned to Belgium with specifications for correction rather than proceeding to judicial review.\n\nThis administrative screening serves a gatekeeping function, filtering out facially deficient requests before consuming judicial resources. The Ministry examines whether mandatory grounds for refusal obviously apply—such as UAE nationality of the fugitive (UAE law generally prohibits extradition of UAE nationals), expiration of applicable statutes of limitations, or the purely political nature of alleged offences.\n\n### Step Three: Prosecutorial Review\n\nIf the Ministry of Justice approves the request administratively, it forwards the matter to the UAE Public Prosecution for substantive legal review. Federal prosecutors assess whether the evidence presented by Belgium meets the required threshold and whether the dual criminality requirement is satisfied. Prosecutors examine UAE criminal law to confirm that conduct described in the Belgian request would constitute criminal offences under UAE statutes if committed within UAE jurisdiction.\n\nThe Public Prosecution also evaluates potential human rights concerns, fair trial issues, and compliance with UAE constitutional protections. This stage involves legal analysis rather than factual determinations of guilt or innocence—the question is whether Belgium has presented sufficient grounds to justify proceeding to judicial hearings, not whether the fugitive actually committed the alleged crimes.\n\n### Step Four: Court Hearing\n\nExtradition matters proceed to the Federal Supreme Court or competent federal court for judicial determination. The requested person receives notice of proceedings and the right to legal representation. Court hearings examine the legality of the extradition request under UAE law and treaty provisions, not the underlying merits of Belgian criminal charges.\n\nJudicial review encompasses several key questions: Does the dual criminality requirement hold? Has Belgium provided sufficient evidence? Do mandatory or discretionary grounds for refusal apply? Does surrendering the individual comply with UAE constitutional protections and international human rights obligations? The requested person may present evidence and legal arguments against extradition through counsel.\n\nCourts issue binding decisions on whether extradition is legally permissible. Approval does not automatically result in surrender—the decision constitutes a legal precondition, confirming that no legal barriers prevent extradition. Adverse court rulings block extradition definitively; Belgium cannot override judicial denials through diplomatic pressure.\n\n### Step Five: Cabinet Approval\n\nFollowing favourable court decisions, the UAE Cabinet (Council of Ministers) makes the final executive determination whether to surrender the fugitive to Belgium. This political stage allows consideration of factors beyond strict legality: diplomatic relations, reciprocity, foreign policy implications, and humanitarian concerns. Cabinet approval represents an act of sovereignty, exercising the UAE’s discretion to grant or deny Belgium’s request even when courts confirm legal permissibility.\n\nThe Cabinet may impose conditions on extradition, such as requiring Belgian assurances regarding treatment, sentence limitations, or protection from death penalty. These conditions become binding on Belgium; violation may trigger diplomatic protests and jeopardise future cooperation.\n\n### Step Six: Physical Surrender\n\nUpon Cabinet approval and satisfaction of any conditions, UAE authorities coordinate physical transfer with Belgian officials. The requested person is delivered to Belgian custody at a designated location—typically Dubai International Airport or Abu Dhabi International Airport—for transport to Belgium. UAE authorities set time limits for Belgium to collect the fugitive; failure to retrieve within specified periods may result in release.\n\n## What Crimes Are Extraditable?\n\nThe UAE–Belgium treaty does not contain an exhaustive list of extraditable offences but rather establishes minimum sentence thresholds and dual criminality requirements. Generally, extradition applies to conduct punishable under both UAE and Belgian law by imprisonment of at least one year (for extradition purposes) or where the remaining sentence to be served exceeds four months.\n\n### Terrorism Offences\n\nTerrorism-related crimes rank among the highest priority extraditable offences. Both the UAE and Belgium maintain comprehensive anti-terrorism legislation criminalising terrorist acts, financing terrorism, membership in terrorist organisations, and supporting terrorist activities. Belgium regularly seeks extradition for individuals allegedly involved in planning or facilitating terrorist operations, recruiting for extremist groups, or providing material support to designated terrorist entities. UAE Federal Law No. 7 of 2014 on Combating Terrorism Offences aligns substantially with Belgian and international terrorism definitions, satisfying dual criminality requirements.\n\n### Cybercrime and Ransomware\n\nRansomware attacks and sophisticated cybercrimes constitute extraditable offences under the UAE–Belgium framework. As digital financial centres, both Dubai and Brussels face significant cyber threats from ransomware operators, cryptojacking schemes, and business email compromise frauds. UAE cybercrime legislation, particularly Federal Decree-Law No. 34 of 2021 on Combating Rumours and Cybercrimes, criminalises hacking, data theft, ransomware deployment, and related digital offences paralleling Belgian computer crime laws. Belgium has sought extradition from the UAE for suspects allegedly operating ransomware-as-a-service platforms or conducting major cyberattacks against Belgian businesses and government infrastructure.\n\n### Money Laundering\n\nMoney laundering represents a core extraditable offence category given both countries’ status as international financial hubs. Dubai’s role in global commerce and Belgium’s position within European banking networks make both jurisdictions targets for laundering proceeds from drug trafficking, corruption, fraud, and organised crime. UAE Federal Decree-Law No. 20 of 2018 on Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism criminalises laundering activities extensively, ensuring dual criminality with Belgian anti-money laundering statutes. The 2024 extradition of John Bico Penaque from the UAE to Belgium on money laundering charges demonstrates active cooperation in this crime category.\n\n### Human Trafficking\n\nHuman trafficking offences are extraditable under the bilateral treaty, reflecting shared commitments to combat modern slavery and exploitation. Both UAE and Belgian law criminalise trafficking for sexual exploitation, forced labour, organ removal, and servitude. UAE Federal Law No. 51 of 2006 on Combating Human Trafficking Crimes (as amended) provides comprehensive criminal prohibitions substantially aligned with Belgian trafficking statutes and international protocols. Belgium occasionally seeks extradition of trafficking network operators who use Dubai as a logistical hub or safe haven.\n\n### Drug Trafficking\n\nNarcotics trafficking constitutes a major category of extraditable offences, though prosecutorial approaches differ significantly between jurisdictions. The UAE enforces strict anti-drug laws with severe penalties, while Belgium takes a more graduated approach distinguishing between drug types and quantities. Nevertheless, large-scale drug trafficking—particularly involving cocaine, heroin, synthetic drugs, and trafficking networks—satisfies dual criminality requirements. The 2024 extradition of Nordin El Hajjioui from the UAE to Belgium for drug trafficking charges exemplifies active cooperation on narcotics cases. Belgium typically focuses extradition requests on major traffickers and organisers rather than low-level offenders.\n\n### Financial Fraud and Corruption\n\nComplex financial frauds, embezzlement, corruption, and commercial crimes are extraditable when exceeding sentence thresholds. Both jurisdictions criminalise fraud, breach of trust, bribery, corruption of public officials, and corporate malfeasance. Belgium occasionally seeks extradition of individuals allegedly involved in major investment frauds, Ponzi schemes, corruption of Belgian officials, or embezzlement from Belgian companies who subsequently fled to Dubai or other UAE locations.\n\n## Evidence and Documentation Requirements\n\nBelgium must satisfy substantial documentation requirements when requesting extradition from the UAE. Federal Law No. 39 of 2006 specifies mandatory contents for extradition requests, which the bilateral treaty reinforces. Insufficient documentation results in request rejection or return for supplementation, delaying proceedings significantly.\n\nExtradition requests must include the original or certified copies of arrest warrants, court judgments, or detention orders issued by competent Belgian authorities. These documents must specify the identity of the wanted person with sufficient detail to ensure correct identification—including full names, aliases, dates and places of birth, nationality, passport details, photographs, and physical descriptions.\n\nBelgium must provide detailed statements of facts describing the alleged criminal conduct, including dates, locations, victims, methods, and consequences. These factual narratives allow UAE authorities to assess dual criminality by comparing described conduct against UAE criminal statutes. Vague or conclusory allegations without factual specificity fail to meet evidentiary thresholds.\n\nCitations to applicable Belgian criminal law provisions are mandatory, including statutory texts demonstrating that alleged conduct constitutes crimes under Belgian law and specifying maximum penalties. UAE reviewers verify that cited offences meet minimum punishment thresholds and that Belgian law authorises prosecution and punishment as claimed.\n\nSupporting evidence establishing reasonable grounds to believe the fugitive committed the alleged offences must accompany requests. This evidentiary showing need not prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt but must exceed bare accusations. Acceptable evidence includes witness statements, forensic reports, financial records, surveillance materials, communications intercepts, and documentary proof linking the suspect to criminal activity.\n\nFor sentence enforcement cases—where Belgium seeks return of convicted persons who fled before completing sentences—Belgium must provide final judgments showing convictions, sentences imposed, time served, and remaining sentence duration. These documents must demonstrate that convictions resulted from proceedings respecting fair trial rights and due process.\n\nAll documents must be properly authenticated through diplomatic channels or consular legalisation and translated into Arabic by certified translators. Authentication confirms document genuineness; translations ensure UAE officials and courts can review submissions in the official language of proceedings.\n\n## Grounds to Refuse Extradition from UAE to Belgium\n\nUAE law and the bilateral treaty enumerate both mandatory and discretionary grounds permitting or requiring refusal of Belgian extradition requests. Understanding these defences is essential for anyone contesting surrender from Dubai or elsewhere in the UAE to Belgium.\n\n### Political Offences Exception\n\nThe UAE may refuse extradition for offences of a political character, though modern treaty practice narrows this exception considerably. Purely political crimes—such as sedition, treason against Belgium, or participation in political demonstrations—generally qualify for the political offence exception. However, serious crimes including terrorism, hostage-taking, attacks on civilians, and crimes against humanity fall outside the exception regardless of political motivations. Belgium rarely encounters successful political offence defences, as most extradition requests involve common crimes rather than political acts.\n\n### UAE Nationality\n\nUAE nationals generally cannot be extradited to foreign countries including Belgium. UAE law prioritises alternative arrangements for nationals wanted abroad: rather than surrender, the UAE may prosecute its own citizens domestically based on Belgian evidence and cooperate through mutual legal assistance. This nationality bar protects UAE citizens from foreign prosecution but does not grant impunity—domestic prosecution remains available. Dual nationals holding both UAE and Belgian (or other) citizenship present complex questions; UAE authorities examine the dominant nationality and genuine connection to the UAE when determining whether the nationality bar applies.\n\n### Double Jeopardy (Ne Bis in Idem)\n\nThe principle of ne bis in idem prohibits extradition when the requested person has already been finally acquitted or convicted for the same conduct in the UAE or another jurisdiction. If UAE courts have adjudicated charges based on the same facts underlying Belgium’s extradition request and issued final judgments, subsequent extradition to Belgium for duplicative prosecution is barred. Similarly, final judgments from third countries may trigger double jeopardy protections depending on circumstances and UAE recognition of foreign judgments. This defence requires proof of prior final adjudication of substantially identical charges based on the same factual conduct.\n\n### Statute of Limitations\n\nExtradition may be refused when either UAE or Belgian statutes of limitations bar prosecution or punishment. If the alleged offences occurred so long ago that Belgian law no longer permits prosecution, or if UAE limitations periods have expired (applying the longer of the two), extradition serves no legitimate purpose. UAE authorities examine both Belgian and UAE limitations statutes, applying whichever provides greater protection to the requested person.\n\n### Disproportionate Sentencing Concerns\n\nThe UAE may refuse extradition when Belgian sentencing frameworks appear grossly disproportionate to UAE standards for comparable conduct. While sentencing differences alone do not bar extradition, extreme disparities raising fundamental fairness concerns may trigger discretionary refusal. Conversely, Belgium occasionally struggles to extradite from the UAE when UAE penalties significantly exceed Belgian sentences for similar crimes, creating reciprocity imbalances.\n\n### Indeterminate Sentences and Preventive Detention\n\nBelgium’s system of interning dangerous offenders indefinitely through renewable preventive detention orders raises potential obstacles. The UAE may view indeterminate detention as violating fundamental justice principles and refuse extradition absent Belgian assurances limiting detention duration. This issue arises primarily in sexual offence cases where Belgium imposes indeterminate “internment” rather than fixed sentences.\n\n### Fair Trial and Human Rights Concerns\n\nUAE authorities may refuse extradition when surrender would violate international human rights obligations or fundamental fairness principles. Concerns include: risk of torture or inhuman treatment in Belgian custody; flagrant denial of fair trial rights in Belgian proceedings; discrimination based on race, religion, nationality, or political opinion; or prosecution for exercising fundamental freedoms. While Belgium’s strong rule of law and EU membership generally satisfy human rights standards, individual cases involving alleged procedural irregularities, discriminatory prosecution, or political motivations may trigger scrutiny.\n\n### Health and Humanitarian Grounds\n\nSerious medical conditions rendering the fugitive unfit for transfer or likely to result in death or severe suffering may justify refusing extradition on humanitarian grounds. Advanced age, terminal illness, or psychiatric conditions requiring specialised treatment unavailable in Belgium or incompatible with detention may warrant discretionary refusal. These humanitarian concerns are balanced against crime seriousness and victim interests.\n\n## Death Penalty and Human Rights Protections\n\nNeither the UAE nor Belgium currently imposes capital punishment in practice, though UAE law retains death penalty provisions for certain serious crimes while Belgium abolished capital punishment entirely. This alignment generally eliminates death penalty concerns in UAE–Belgium extradition cases, unlike situations involving countries actively executing offenders.\n\nHowever, theoretical death penalty issues could arise if Belgium sought extradition for conduct potentially subject to capital punishment under UAE law, raising questions about reciprocal treatment. More practically, both countries must ensure extradition complies with international human rights standards, including Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights (binding on Belgium) and UAE constitutional protections.\n\nBelgium’s obligations under EU law and the European Convention on Human Rights require careful assessment before requesting extradition from countries with different human rights frameworks. The UAE similarly examines whether surrendering individuals to Belgium would violate UAE constitutional guarantees or international treaty obligations.\n\nSpecific human rights protections relevant to UAE–Belgium extradition include prohibition of torture and inhuman treatment, fair trial rights, protection against arbitrary detention, and prohibition of discrimination. Both countries generally satisfy these standards, though individual cases may present specific concerns requiring diplomatic assurances or conditional surrender arrangements.\n\n## Notable Cases: UAE Extradition to Belgium\n\nActual extraditions from the UAE to Belgium demonstrate the treaty’s practical operation and provide insight into cooperation patterns and case types prioritised by Belgian authorities.\n\n### Nordin El Hajjioui (2024) — Drug Trafficking\n\nIn 2024, the UAE extradited Nordin El Hajjioui to Belgium to face drug trafficking charges. The case involved alleged participation in a narcotics trafficking network importing substantial quantities of controlled substances into Belgium and broader European markets. Belgian authorities sought El Hajjioui’s surrender after he relocated to the UAE, presumably seeking to avoid prosecution.\n\nThe successful extradition demonstrates UAE–Belgium cooperation on serious drug trafficking cases involving organised criminal networks. The case proceeded through standard extradition procedures: formal Belgian request, UAE Ministry of Justice review, prosecutorial assessment, court approval, and Cabinet authorisation for surrender. El Hajjioui’s extradition illustrates that Dubai and other UAE locations do not provide safe havens for major drug traffickers wanted in Belgium, particularly when backed by solid evidence and proper documentation.\n\n### John Bico Penaque (2024) — Money Laundering\n\nAlso in 2024, the UAE extradited John Bico Penaque to Belgium on money laundering charges. The case reportedly involved laundering proceeds from underlying criminal activities through financial transactions and corporate structures. Money laundering prosecutions typically involve complex financial evidence tracing illicit funds through multiple jurisdictions and accounts.\n\nPenaque’s extradition reflects UAE commitment to combating money laundering and financial crime cooperation with Belgium. As major financial centres, both jurisdictions prioritise disrupting money laundering operations that exploit international banking systems. The case demonstrates that individuals using the UAE for financial activities connected to Belgian money laundering charges face real extradition risk when Belgium presents sufficient evidence and follows proper procedures.\n\nThese 2024 cases represent the early operational phase of the UAE–Belgium extradition treaty following its 2022 entry into force. As cooperation matures, additional extraditions across various crime categories should follow, establishing precedents and refining procedural practices.\n\n## How to Fight Extradition from UAE to Belgium\n\nContesting extradition from Dubai or elsewhere in the UAE to Belgium requires sophisticated legal strategy combining technical procedural defences, substantive challenges to Belgian allegations, and advocacy regarding human rights and fairness concerns. Early engagement of experienced extradition counsel maximises defence prospects.\n\n### Legal Defences and Challenge Strategies\n\nMultiple defence avenues exist for challenging Belgian extradition requests:\n\n**Dual criminality challenges**: Demonstrating that alleged conduct does not constitute crimes under UAE law defeats the fundamental dual criminality requirement. This defence requires careful comparative legal analysis of Belgian and UAE criminal statutes, examining whether conduct described in Belgian charging documents actually violates UAE criminal provisions when all elements are considered.\n\n**Evidentiary insufficiency**: Challenging the adequacy of evidence submitted by Belgium can defeat extradition at the prosecutorial or judicial review stages. If Belgian submissions fail to establish reasonable grounds linking the fugitive to alleged crimes, UAE authorities should reject the request. This defence involves scrutinising witness statements, documentary evidence, and factual narratives for inconsistencies, gaps, or conclusory assertions lacking substantiation.\n\n**Identity challenges**: Proving that the person arrested is not the individual Belgium actually seeks results in immediate release. Mistaken identity defences require documentary evidence—passports, identification documents, biographical records—establishing that the detained person differs from the Belgian target despite name similarities or other confusion.\n\n**Statute of limitations**: Demonstrating that Belgian or UAE limitations periods have expired bars extradition. This technical defence requires calculating applicable periods under both legal systems and proving that alleged offences occurred outside actionable timeframes.\n\n**Prior adjudication**: Establishing that UAE courts or other competent tribunals previously adjudicated the same charges triggers double jeopardy protections. This defence requires producing final judgments showing acquittal or conviction for substantially identical conduct based on the same factual basis as Belgian charges.\n\n**Human rights violations**: Presenting evidence that extradition would violate fundamental rights may trigger discretionary refusal. Effective human rights defences require specific, credible evidence of likely violations—not generalised or speculative concerns. Expert testimony regarding Belgian detention conditions, procedural fairness issues in Belgian proceedings, or discriminatory prosecution may support these challenges.\n\n**Political offence exception**: Demonstrating the purely political character of alleged offences invokes the political exception, though this defence succeeds rarely given modern treaty limitations. Effective political offence defences require showing that Belgium targets the fugitive for political beliefs, opposition activities, or protected expression rather than common crimes.\n\n### Bail and Detention Pending Proceedings\n\nPersons subject to Belgian extradition requests typically face detention during UAE proceedings, though bail remains theoretically available. UAE courts assess flight risk, crime seriousness, evidence strength, and public safety when considering pretrial release. Extradition subjects generally present high flight risk given incentives to avoid surrender, making bail difficult to obtain. However, strong community ties, health concerns, weak Belgian evidence, or lengthy procedural delays may support bail applications in appropriate cases.\n\nConditions of pretrial detention must comply with UAE constitutional protections and international standards. Detained persons retain rights to legal counsel, family contact, consular access (for Belgian nationals), and humane conditions. Defence counsel should monitor detention conditions and raise concerns about procedural violations or mistreatment.\n\n### Appeal Procedures and Timeframes\n\nUAE extradition decisions are subject to judicial review and appeal through federal court structures. Adverse trial court rulings permit appeals to higher courts, presenting opportunities to challenge legal conclusions, evidentiary findings, or procedural irregularities. Appellate advocacy focuses on demonstrating legal errors, misapplication of treaty provisions or domestic law, or failure to consider relevant defences.\n\nEven after court approval, the Cabinet decision remains discretionary, creating additional advocacy opportunities. Defence counsel may submit representations to Cabinet members highlighting humanitarian concerns, diplomatic considerations, or fairness issues warranting discretionary refusal despite judicial approval.\n\nExtradition proceedings in the UAE typically conclude within several months to over a year depending on case complexity, procedural challenges, and appeals. Belgian requests involving straightforward facts, strong evidence, and minimal defences may proceed relatively quickly, while contested cases with substantial legal issues, evidentiary disputes, or appeals extend considerably longer.\n\n## Frequently Asked Questions\n\n

\n\n

\n\n

\n\n

\n\n

\n\n

\n\n## Contact Our UAE Extradition Lawyers\n\nFacing potential extradition from Dubai or elsewhere in the UAE to Belgium requires immediate engagement of experienced legal counsel specialising in international criminal law and UAE extradition procedures. Our legal team provides comprehensive representation throughout extradition proceedings, from initial detention through court hearings, appeals, and Cabinet-level advocacy. We conduct detailed analysis of Belgian allegations, evidence sufficiency, dual criminality issues, and available defences under Federal Law No. 39 of 2006 and the UAE–Belgium bilateral treaty.\n\nOur services include challenging provisional arrest warrants, contesting formal extradition requests on procedural and substantive grounds, presenting human rights and fairness concerns, negotiating diplomatic assurances, and pursuing all available appellate remedies. We coordinate with Belgian counsel when appropriate to address underlying charges and explore alternatives to extradition including voluntary return with negotiated conditions.\n\nContact our office immediately upon learning of Belgian extradition interest or arrest warrants. Early intervention provides maximum opportunity to contest detention, gather evidence supporting defences, and develop comprehensive legal strategy. Our multilingual team handles cases throughout Dubai, Abu Dhabi, and all UAE emirates with detailed knowledge of UAE extradition law, Belgian criminal procedure, and international judicial cooperation frameworks.\n\n

See Also — UAE Extradition Legal Resources

• UAE Extradition Law — Federal Law No. 39 of 2006 — the legal framework governing all extraditions from the UAE
• How UAE Extradition Works — step-by-step process from request to surrender
• Grounds to Refuse Extradition from UAE — legal defences available to you
• Extradition from UAE — All Countries — complete country-by-country guide
• Contact UAE Extradition Lawyers — 24/7 emergency consultation